Sunday, August 28, 2011

Iran Warns NATO against Syria Intervention

Iran warned NATO on Sunday against intervention in Syria, saying if NATO enters Syria, it would be bogged down in a “quagmire.”

Iran's Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi reiterated its support for Syria, but added that Syrian President Bashar Assad should answer the “legitimate demands” of his people.

Salehi said a political vacuum in Syria would lead to an unprecedented regional crisis, and blamed protests and killings on “outside agitators” [ISNA, 28 August].

36 comments:

Anonymous said...

Iran sounds more desperate by the day as it watches Assad, its key ally in its ME adventures, fail.

Assad has less than 100 days left.

Anonymous said...

I'm surprised that Russia and China are not concerned. What NATO is doing is saying that any country that is allied with Russia/China and not with NATO will be overthrown by military force under the pretext of helping their people (even if the NATO invasion winds up killing tens of thousands). Meanwhile, countries favorable to NATO will have their popular protests suppressed by military force. Such brazen imperialism is unseen for decades.

- Iraq - done. no explanation required.
- Afghanistan - done. no explanation required.
- Libya - done. Military bombing + a group of rebels overthrew the government, killing tens of thousands of Libyans.
- Bahrain - done. Military invasion kept NATO friendly government in power.
- Yemen - done. Drone strikes etc. kept NATO friendly government in power.
- Syria - Next

Anonymous said...

The thing is Iran can't do much as regards Syria for example it can't send in the tanks or troops.
It can't attack Turkey that would be the end of the regime because of NATO.
It can't fight the will of the Syrian people which is the majority Sunni population 85 per cent so Iran is stuck on this one and will definitely lose a very important ally in Damascus.

Turkey being part of NATO could intervene easily just across the border and create a buffer zone a few miles deep this alone will embolden the Syrian masses even more in their wish to bring down the Assad regime.

If Assad doesn't stop his heavy handed crackdown on the masses this might lead to a NATO intervention something will have to give and I put my money on Assad's downfall.

Anonymous said...

Anon 1:47 PM,


----" What NATO is doing is saying that any country that is allied with Russia/China and not with NATO will be overthrown by military force ..."

is pretty silly. Syria is not "allied" with either Russia or China, it's allied with Iran. Russia and China do business with Syria and nothing more,

none of the other countries on your list are allies of either the Russians or the Chinese.

matter of fact, anyone saying that the Afghanistan Taliban was an ally of the Russians is pretty much hopelessly wrong.




Afghanistan was done with plenty of explanation and with UN blessing.

Libya the same with UN blessing that came at the urging of the Arab league.

Yemen is uncertain and the drone strikes weren't to keep the government in power.

you got Iraq about right , though.

Anonymous said...

anno August 28, 2011 2:18 PM

Turkey has a miserable military,
very bad organized and miserable Generals
look how they suffer high causualties against few PKK fighters. even today 3 Turk officier killed and a Bomob im torist ressort Khmer exploded.

anyway
you can be sure, if NATO attacks syria, The Iranian missilies will destroy the NATO bases.
Ahmadi nejad said this to Turk Forein minister last time he was in Tehran

Anonymous said...

August 28, 2011 1:47 PM

Affghamnistan and Irq are finished hih Causualtiers continur for US Army , and the state is bankrupt because cost of the war.

Iran won those wars.

Anonymous said...

Anon 3:18 PM,

Iran's military doesn't stack up to Turkey's and Iran doesn't have any ability to bring much of it to bear against Turkey.

Any attack against Turkey that the Iranian gov't has the courage to mount directly (rather than pin on their clients), and you can be sure that Iran hasn't the courage to openly attack, will bring disaster to iran.

the only way that the Iranian gov't ever "wins" an armed engagement is when it let's other men fight and then, vulture-like, picks at the bones of the loser.

the very idea that iran would fight NATO over Syria is laughable. they might do their usual and send some other guys to blow themselves up while the IRGC stays in hiding.

Anonymous said...

i believe if assad smart enough would creat strong war againest israel that will shake intire reigne so far assad had manage to do good job to demolished intire uprising againest him it is big defferent with lybia few thousand missenary hired by west to take control of lybia people and act of stuiped leadership creat such mess up in lybia but seria tolally deferent reaction assad must open new front line if become treated by west and i believe iran will not abanded seria what so ever just must hold the line by end of this year until usa may leave iraq that is hand much open for reaction in the power forces in the region to get rid of those messanari are comming from turkey and saudi plus iraq to fight in the name of freedom for people of seria one he must immadiatly creat local forces to train in the border area for resestance out sider inter or out train and arm them. two is the best time for seria and iran hamas hesbola to strike in hard of israel the sooner the better and first show west they had enough bolshed from them secoundly practice the military muscle for real not wait every year or so let west strike them and like child go to un for condemination which result nothing ,third iran bring his special force in seria and israel border ashora and quad forces those will strong enough to hold atlease few thousand tank and two army devisine in the seria border line plus they are fears fighter and really fight the last man and last bollet with isreal/ too seria leader assad must open that line once for ever if he late he would gone forever.

Anonymous said...

Anon 3:18 PM

Do you know what your talking about because if Iran fires those ballistic missiles at any NATO bases Turkey included Iran will have to deal with the combined NATO might which includes the US.

And you know what's going to happen there don't you?
The Iranian armed forces wont stand a chance if the combined NATO forces take their kid gloves off.

Don't forget the US has dozens of submarines with ballistic missiles armed with nuclear and conventional warheads
also Tomahawk cruise missiles.
They could base the F22 raptor in a NATO country such as Turkey even the F15 will be enough let alone the aircraft carriers with their F18s and each carrier has about 80 or 90 aircraft multiply that by 15 or so carriers and there you have it.
That doesn't include other NATO countries Turkey for example with about 225 plus F16S and large force of Phantoms 150 plus all in working order.

What will Iran fight with?
Old lack of spare parts air force?
Old T55 and T72 tanks?
Old Russian submarines only 3 plus against US 50 plus nuclear submarines.
Or just fight with AAA guns and RPG7 Saddam tried that look what happened.
Islamic government is playing a very dangerous game of poker here and the odds are against them.

Anonymous said...

Anon 1:29.
In the last 30 something years , every one against Iran has disapeared and been destroyed either by Iran or by themselves.
Every Iranian ally has grown stronger and more relevant, despite of being wished dead and pronounced dead by the likes of you.

You must be a very young boy.

Anonymous said...

@ ANON 1:29PM 100 DAYS LEFT.

IN YOUR DREAMS, SYRIA HAS WELL TRAINED AND CAPABLE ARMY AND ALSO
CAPABLE AIRFORCE. UNLIKE LYBIAN AIRFORCE UNPROFESSIONAL AND INADEQUATELY TRAINED!SYRIA WILL CROSS INTO TURKEY FIRST! AND IRAN WILL PROVIDE MILITARY LOGISTICAL SUPPORT! I PREDICT NATO TO WITHDRAW
FORCES IN 20 DAYS DUE TO LARGE CASUALTIES AND LOST OF AIRCRAFT FIGTERS, DUE TO SYRIAN SAMS, MIGS, AND SHOULDER LAUNCH SAMS. SYRIA HAS A ANTI AIRCRAFT SA-16 IGLA BRIGADE! AND OF COURSE SYRIAN PROGOV. ELEMENTS 83%OF COUNTRY WILL NOT SIDE WITH OPPOSITION LIKE TRAITOR LIBYANS! SYRIAN PEOPLE WILL UNITE BEHIND THEIR LEADER! AND RESIST NATO INVASION. HEZBOLLAH WILL ALSO BRING UP THE REAR! ALONG WITH IRANIAN MISSILES!, AND ATTACK BOATS.
FULL SCALE WORL WAR -3 IF RUSSIA INTERVENES.

Anonymous said...

Anon 9:42 Syria has a iffy military at best. Some good people and things, but mostly fit for shooting unarmed folks. their equipment is old and third-rate when it was new.

They barely held their own against Israel when the Israelis were fighting Syria's best with a small part of their own force while the bulk was engaged elsewhere....and that was when they were being supplied by the USSR.

Since then, they've fallen much further back and the would be nearly useless against European troops.
Against the US military, they would be broken in a couple of days.


But none of that matters, because THEY WON"T FIGHT.
Troops are defecting now rather than fire on the people and defecting in ever-increasing numbers.
Some reports from inside Syria say that the loyalists are turning their guns on the troops that are quitting.

That spells the end of the army as a real force.
It'll be reduced to a loyalist core and een then individual commanders are going to be wondering whether to fight for a doomed regime or make a deal.

Anonymous said...

Dude, Turkey's army is overrated..They cannot stand on their own two feet without NATO.As a matter of fact, they're in NATO because they're weak and needs NATO's protection.

Their tactics sucks, to say the least. They've been fighting a rag-tag Kurdish militia for ages with no end in sight despite all their fancy NATO weapons.

Believe me, Turkey's involvement in Syria could possibly break up Turkey itself. Syria will have a justification to also openly arm Kurdish militants to reak havoc in Turkey and even worse, give them citizenship. Turkey wouldn't dare attack Syria while Russia has a huge naval base there..There's bravado and reality and the Turks are full of bravado..

Turkey is full of bluster-no show. Israel killed 9 of her citizens and all she asked for is a apology which she won't get..

blackmanAdam said...

SYRIA is not a push over as some Guys want to put it here.closely supported by Iran ,SHE can make any Nato military move against it be catastrophic .ONE NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND THE MILITARY POTENTIAL OF IRAN:today Iran is a missile power-it manufactures missiles as per its needs therefore no one can estimate the amount in its arsenal.Again it is a RADAR power-this means it manufactures its own variety of radars such that it has always kept its enemies guessing and estimating.Iran is among the world leaders in mines production and everybody knows this.so LET NATO KEEP OFF SYRIA TO AVOID HUMILIATION.

Anonymous said...

Turkeys military isn't weak it's a highly trained force and well equipped as well belonging to NATO.
Any body who says Iran can fight NATO to protect Syria should go on medication.

You guys should read some books about US and NATO military equipment
and tactics before commenting here because it sounds ridiculous.

Anonymous said...

@Anon august 29, 2011,8:46 am

youre the one who's being rediculous! THE SYRIANS ARE NOT GOING TO LET A FOREIGN NEIBHOR INVADE THEIR COUNTRY,WOULD YOU?
AND GET REAL! NATO CAN'T HANDLE THE TALIBAN OR LYBIA FOR THAT MATTER.

1. SYRIA HAS SAMS AND MANPAD SAM BRIGADE!
2.RUSSIAN AIRBASE IS IN SYRIA PROTECTING RUSSIAN INTEREST
3. IRAN AND SYRIA HAVE A DEFENSE PACT!
4.SYRIA HAS PROFESSIONAL MILITARY AND AIRFORCE! AND HEZBOLLAH!
SYRIA WILL ARM THE PKK MILITIA AND ALONG WITH IRANS HELP TURKEY WILL BE PARALYZED BECAUSE THEY WIIL FEAR LOSING GROUND TO THE KURDS!
IRAN AND SYRIA WILL REINFORCE PKK.
PKK WILL BE LIKE HEZBOLLAH ON STEROIDS! TURKEY WILL HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO CALL A CEASE FIRE AND A END TO HOSTILITIES. I WARN YOU! THE TURKS DON'T KNOW WHAT THEIR BARGANING FOR! YOUR LITTLE LAME PREDICTIONS AND ANALYTIC PIPE DREAMS DO NOT APPLY!
WERE TALKING A POSSIBLE WORLD WAR-3
SCENARIO. FOR THOSE WHO ARE CONCERN ABOUT HUMAN LIFE! IF YOU CARE AT ALL! THIS WILL NOT BE A TURKEY SHOOT LIKE LYBIA, LYBIAN FORCES DID NOT OFFER TRUE RESISTANCE! THE SYRIAN PEOPLE WILL!

Anonymous said...

Anon August 29 2:27 AM

"Turkey's tactics sucks,to say the least"

So the tactics of the IRGC and their Akhoond Generals doesn't suck when they sent kids over the mines and did human wave attacks for six remaining years of the eight year war with the net result of losing tens of thousand of lives.

Their tactics were similar to WW1 they never went to officer training school like donkeys they obeyed their ignorant Akoonds!

"Turkey is full of bluster"
Really?...So the organ grinder and his Antar with the IRGC akhoond generals don't bluster do they?

Every time they claim they made this or that military hardware they throw it at Americans and Israeli faces as if they are the only ones that poses these weapons.
Believe me these IRGC "Generals" live in cloud akhoond land!
They need to go back to school and then after that go to officer training school.

Turkey joined NATO because of the Soviet Union a superpower at the time and Turkey still is part of NATO because it benefits both sides.

If NATO Turkey decide to go across border into Syria neither Iran nor Russia can stop it!

Now you people go and convince yourselves that Iran and Syria can fight NATO and win but expect a nasty and shocking surprise.

As I mentioned in my other comments you guys should read some books regarding NATO and US doctrine and hardware you will feel better for it and will save you time in writing rubbish and me reading it.

Anonymous said...

Anon August 29 3:52 PM

I am a military man that served my country for a number of years and I say you need to calm down and face realities of the world.

You know absolutely nothing of military doctrine or countries capabilities.

Syria was beat by the Israeli air force in fact the Syrians wouldn't dare send their air force up because they knew they would be shot out of the sky.Same will apply the Syrians against the NATO forces.

Man pads are limited in range and SAM and radars are limited by their location and can be identified by their infra-red and electronic signal before a multiple strike.

Syria is a sitting duck just waiting to be shot at. I feel sorry for them and if the Islamic regime wants to be involved in it they will receive the same treatment with consequences far beyond your understanding.

And another thing the majority of "Syrian people"about 85 percent what to see the back of the Assad regime and they will do anything to get rid of it!

Sweet Dreams.

Anonymous said...

-----"NATO CAN'T HANDLE THE TALIBAN OR LYBIA FOR THAT MATTER."---

turns out that NATO handled Libya without breaking a sweat, silly rabbit.

and the Taliban was pushed from being the ruling power in Afghanistan nearly effortlessly.

moving Assad out of Syria, should NATO undertake the job, is a certainty and time frame depends only on how many resources NATO wants to expend.....a week , two weeks, a month or two if they want to go slow before Assad takes the family into exile.

blackmanAdam said...

in reply to the Military man anon-17-

YOU ARE WRONG! WHAT you said is not true!!to compare Syria and Israel in a war is not fair.MIND YOU SYRIA IS BUT A BUYER OF ARMS. A CUSTOMER OF The Wests' and others defense products. But Israel in an arms producing Nation.and as usual the west sell to Arabs weak weapons.if Syria buys an f16 THEN REMEMBER ISRAEL HAS AN F22 OR 35 complete with an anti 16 radar system.all this is to make Israel superior!. BUT IRAN is A DIFFERENT Case, SHE MAKES her own arms,she knows the weakness of the WEST military tools .so i say with Iran on its side NATO SHOULD BACK OFF SYRIA TO AVOID humiliation

Anonymous said...

Blackman Adam

I don't need you to tell me about the Iranian military since I served it for a number of years.
And to tell me I'm wrong is like you going to a dentist and telling him how to extract your tooth out!

The problem with you is that you have been listening to Press TV lies as regarding about Iran meaning that you don't know the reality of the country.

Iran can't afford another war particularly with US or NATO so you telling me about the state of the Iranian military is a bit rich.

What Iran needs to do is stop this anti west and anti Israel nonsense for the mullahs to go to their mosques and stay out of politics so that our country can go back to normal.
Blackman Adam I think you should take my advice as an Iranian with personal experience of the Iranian military and economic situation and don't listen to the minority of misguided Iranians who live in the west or are brainwashed and are agents of the IRGC propaganda machine.

Anonymous said...

Annon August 30, 2011 10:10 AM

I agree completely with your notes. You don't need to convince an individual (backman Adam) who has never been to Iran and has nothing in common with Iranians about the reality of life in Iran. I guess and judging by the statements that this goy has made, the life in his country must be very miserable. So he can see salvation in Islam. What I do not understand is why this individual does not pester Saudi blogs (assuming that they have one) and comes in here to talk about stuff that he has no clue.

Anonymous said...

blackmanAdam,
you're quite correct that it's just wrong to compare Syria's military might with that of Israel. Syria can't match up or even come close.
equally, it would be foolish to think that Syria could fight NATO nations, far more powerful that is Israel, without Syrian forces being simply overwhelmed.

Syria and/or Hezbollah can fire some rockets, but then what? they can't stop NATO from controlling the skies above Syria.

Israel sent airplanes and bombed Syria's would-be nuclear reactor into rubble and Syria never got off a shot against them, didn't even know the the planes were there until the bombs started exploding.

what does that tell you?

Nader Uskowi said...

To our commentators and readers,

The purpose of the comments section is to engage in conversations on the topics posted. As much as we like to stay away from monitoring the comments, we are forced every now and then to monitor some out, due to personal attacks and use of foul language. Unfortunately we had to stop publication of a bunch here on this post because of their obvious racial and anti-African overtones, not acceptable to us and not part of the conversation on Syria.

Anonymous said...

@ ANON AUGUST 30 10:10 AM
IF YOU WERE IN THE IRANIAN MILITARY
WHAT BRANCH WERE YOU IN? WHAT WAS YOUR M.O.S.? HOW MANY YEARS DID YOU SERVE? DID YOU SERVE THROUGH 1980-89 OR PRIOR? SINCE YOU KNOW THE IRANIAN MILITARY SO WELL!! I'M ASSUMMING YOU SERVED IN EVERY BRANCH. WHICH IS IMPOSSIBLE!SO BE SPECIFIC. WERE YOU INFANTRY? NAVAL OPERATIONS? IF YOU FOUGHT IN THE IRAQ CONFLICT? I'LL GIVE YOU SOME WESTERN BROWNIE POINTS. YOU OBVIOUSLY ARE NOT A TRAINED ANALYST
BECAUSE YOUR TOO ONESIDED YOU SEEM TO HAVE A DOG IN EVERY FIGHT!
AND YOU FORGET ONE THING THAT IF THE WEST IS SO TOUGH! THEN WHY DID ISRAEL LOOSE TO HEZBOLLAH? IF YOURE THE TRAINED MILITARY PROFESSIONAL THAT YOU CLAIM TO BE. YOU KNOW THEN THAT ISRAEL DID NOT ACCOMPLISH ITS OBJECTIVE IN LEBANON!!
1.ISRAEL WAS GIVEN A TOTAL OF 90 DAYS TO ACCOMPLISH ITS OBJECTIVE.
2. ISRAEL QUIT IN 33 DAYS DUE TO THE LOST OF HEAVY MILITARY
PERSONNEL.
3.THE ISRAELI MISSION WAS TO SUCCESSFULLY REOCCUPY SOUTHERN LEBANON, THEY FAILED!
4.TO STOP HEZBOLLAH MISSILES FROM PENETRATING CIVILIAN POPULATION, ISRAEL FAILED,TO DO IT!
ISRAELI SPECIAL FORCES SYARET MATKAL AMONG OTHERS WERE STOPPED COLD IN THEIR TRACKS. EVEN THE ISRAELIS ADMITED DEFEAT, THAT IS WHY THE EHUD BARAC ADMINISTRATION WAS OFFICIALLY INDICTED AND CHARGED WITH FAILING TO PROTECT ISRAELI CITIZENS.
5.ISRAEL FAILED MISERABLY TO ACCOMPLISH ITS WAR OBJECTIVES AND OUT OF FRUSTRATION RESORTED TO BOMBING INNOCENT LEBONESE CIVILIANS.
NOW MY NEXT QUESTION TO YOU IS IF HEZBOLLAH CAN KEEP ISRAEL, THE LARGEST AIRFORCE IN THE M.E. OUT OF LEBANON, WHAT DO YOU THINK SYRIA CAPABILITIES ARE? CMON BE HONEST YOURE A MILITARY MAN?
LETS LOOSE THE THE EMOTION AN USE THAT INGENIUS MILITARY MIND OF YOURS. MY POINT IS MR. MILITARY GENIUS, THAT SYRIA IS CAPABLE OF TAKING ON NATO AN WINNING WITH THE HELP OF IRAN. WHETHER YOU WANT TO ACCEPT IT OR NOT!

"THE IRANIANS TRAINED HEZBOLLAH
AND DID AN EXCELLENT JOB AT ARMING THEM THIS IS A CRIME AGAINST THE JEWISH PEOPLE AND ALL PEACE LOVING NATIONS"

BENJAMIN NETANYAHU.

SO GIVE YOUR FORMER MILITARY COMRADES SOME CREDIT SPORT!
ITS OBVIUSLY BEEN A LONG TIME SINCE YOUVE SERVED WITH YOUR IRANIAN COUNTRYMEN!

ATTN: MODERATOR THEIR ARE NO INSULTS IN THIS COMMENTARY. PLEAS ALLOW POSTING.

Anonymous said...

in your respond to question of israel the new war with israel can not be successful if you try to match tank to tank capablity or air craft to aircraft to gain the ground and air to day war in that region will be diferend line up for tank you need anitank and sniper be capale to kill from 1000 metter or more for enemy aircraft you need missle to match strategic of enemy such as airport power plan so on important of all to know information of your counter enemy to successfuly excute you mission also for light amy has faster changes of his position before capable to locate them location in lobenon war the show absulote effective or same as taliban doing in the afganistan war,good commander will creat such desiption to his enemy to strike the desire point then he can excute all army of his enemy trap that you see in lobenan war and hisbola damaged israel war ship all is above how you desive you enemy to come forward then suprise attack will come true so many other thing not i have the pation to write up or anyone like to reat it just to day war is loge distance how is closer to war zone has much better chance to suvive than those in far far away from war zone live.

blackmanAdam said...

RIGHT OF REPLY -to my brother military man !.......

INDEED YOU SERVED IN THE IRANIAN MILITARY BUT THE SAD NEWS IS that your analysis lacks balance!is it because your hatred of the regime blinds you?YOU ARE TELLING US THAT 'IRAN can't afford a war with NATO!!" i have never heard anyone in Iran saying 'Iran can afford a war! with NATO .what IRAN has always said is that it is ready to defend itself.meanwhile a think tank in US has settled that Iran has capabilities,again Mr Dagan ex Mossad chief warns Israel that Iran has capabilities.we have heard the US commanders in IRAQ and Afghanistan talking about IRANIAN arms in the hands of insurgents that are lethal.we don't know if its true but this point to capabilities on the side of IRAN.that is why i said SYRIA is not IRAN and when military think tanks say that a nation has some capabilities it means, THAT NATION produces its own variety of military tools.SO a buyer like Saudi Arabia can't be classified as having capabilities against the WEST because all its tools are monitored !!so then i repeat, you are Shallow to compare SYRIA and ISRAEL in war just as you are wrong to belittle IRAN'S MILITARY. CAPABILITIES.HOWEVER thanks a lot for wishing peace for your country!.

Anonymous said...

Hezbollah never ever kept the Israeli Air Force out of Lebanon. The last time around Israel ran out of known targets to bomb and was bombing the same ones a second or third time.

Hard to understand why Hezbollah was apologizing and handing out money for people to rebuild homes that were destroyed by Israeli bombs, including Hezbollah-controlled neighborhoods in Beirut, if they were able to keep the Israelis from dominating Lebanon's skies.

Anonymous said...

Anon August 30 12:53 PM


First of all who do you think you are
by questioning me if I served my country?
Secondly learn how to spell correctly when you try to be smart with someone.For example Ingenious which you spelled incorrectly.

So judging by your spelling and lack of respect by trying to be smart which your not and questioning me about a subject that you no nothing about has made me release that I'm wasting my time with you.

When the time is up for Syrian regime we shall see who has the
ingenious military mind you who wrights in emotional large letters
or me who tried to tell you the facts.

Now go and learn the hard way !

Anonymous said...

@ANON AUGUST 30 2011 4:34 PM

"So judging by your spelling and lack of respect by trying to be smart which your not and questioning me about a subject that you no nothing about has made me release that I'm wasting my time with you".


DEAR SIR I AM NOT TRYING TO BE DISRESPECTFUL TO YOU! IT'S JUST THAT I QUESTION A MAN THAT HAS SUPPOSEDLY FOUGHT FOR HIS COUNTRY AND HAS SO MUCH ANIMOSITY FOR HIS OWN PEOPLE! AND I PROMISE YOU, THAT I WILL LEARN HOW TO SPELL INGENIOUS IF YOU LEARN HOW TO SPELL THE WORD REALIZE! AND YOURE RIGHT WE WILL SEE WHO WINS THIS NEW WAR.

Anonymous said...

BlackmanAdam.

I'm getting rather tired of this nonsense discussing some issue that some people on this blog know little about.

I'm really sorry if I heart your feelings regarding Syria's military capability against NATO and Turkey because you were right and know better than me as a soldier who served the armed forces for eight years and knows nothing about Iran as a Iranian,
therefor this is the scenario.

Syria single handed can easily ward off NATO and then move into Turkey and occupy it as long as it takes meanwhile Iranian forces with their wonder weapons will liberate the entire Persian Gulf and middle east and destroy the US armed forces causing the US to capitulate there by making Iran and Syria the new global superpowers with Khamenei at its helm.

How's that astonishing isn't it?
I sincerely hope you enjoyed that little story.

No the deep hatred of the shallow mullahs towards the Iranian culture blinds them against our people.I just want them to go back to their mosques and stick to prayers and stay out of politics something that you don't want to understand.

All the best.

Anonymous said...

Anon August 30 7:58 PM

There is a difference between Ingenious and (igenius) there is no such word.

But granted I inserted the wrong word in which case was release instead of realize both are words and spelled correctly!

But since you want to go down this road lets mention a few more of your spelling mistakes for example (Lebonese)instead of Lebanese or (neibhor) instead of neighbour and neighbor US spelling and (assumming)instead of assuming etc etc.

You see what happens when you play with matches you can easily burn your fingers!
Let this be a portent for things to come as regards Syria and the Islamic regime!

"Animosity for his own people"

I have animosity towards the mullahs not my people!
If you lived in Iran which you clearly don't then you would understand the peoples animosity towards the mullahs.

Happy Dreaming!

Anonymous said...

@ ANON AUGUST 31 8:18AM

YOU SOUND LIKE A VERY PETTY OLDMAN!
I WAS TRYING TO EXTEND AN OLIVE BRANCH TO YOU. ALTHOUGH WE DISAGREE
ON MILITARY AND POLITICAL ISSUES I'M ASSUMING THAT YOURE A MATURE ADULT WITH HIS OWN TAKE ON THE WORLD. I CAN RESPECT YOUR OPINIONS.
AND YOUR RHETORICAL RANTINGS ABOUT YOUR COUNTRYMEN! BUT YOU DON'T SEEM TO HAVE THE GOOD DECENCY TO RESPECT THE OPINIONS OF OTHERS. THIS IS NOT A SPELLING BEA, THIS IS A POLITICAL BLOG! AND IF IT WAS YOU'VE ALREADY LOST! BOTTOM LINE, IF YOU WANT RESPECT YOU HAVE TO GIVE IT. FROM THIS POINT ON I WILL NO LONGER RESPOND TO YOUR PETTY COMMENTARIES, YOURE OBVIOUSLY NOT AN INTELLECTUAL. AND YOUR MANNERISMS ARE BETWEEN A CHILD AND AN EMBITTERD OLD WOMAN! IF YOU DON'T CHANGE, YOUR GOING TO DIE A SAD AND MISERABLE OLD MAN! I FEEL SORRY FOR YOU,GOOD RIDDANCE!

MODERATOR PLEASE ALLOW COMMENTARY
CONTENT NOT INTENDED TO BE INSULTING.

blackmanAdam said...

tmy brother "YOU LOOK LIKE A PRETY OLD MAN..!!!!

oh! please learn to forgive !! i know the Guy took his jokes a little bit too far.But you are educative and clear, so just ignore such people! thanks brother.

Anonymous said...

YOU TROLL !!

Anonymous said...

How Iran Keeps Assad in Power in Syria

The Weapons, Technology, and Expertise Tehran Sends Damascus

X-ops 3.2 v-x 1.9 11/1/11

http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/68230/geneive-abdo/how-iran-keeps-assad-in-power-in-syria