![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjMCrbVC-BWm0-uZD3RkhnKhDNeDRlAlDfQrPA6u_hH9NxhlMQKj81Jn0wZSXDPHDTkUszhCg_oNKI_6QSJx3vNfviiFXDYBmamDl060z5fvYZ496PEN3f44yvRiLnKs3kZy2wcAdLQcRny/s200/el-boradei.jpg)
El-Baradei was quoted in a New York Times interview as saying his inspectors’ initial findings at the fortified site beneath a desert mountain near the city of Qom were “nothing to be worried about.” “The idea was to use it as a bunker under the mountain to protect things,” El-Baradei, alluding to Tehran’s references to the site as a fallback for its nuclear program in case its larger Natanz enrichment plant were bombed by the United States or Israel.
“It’s a hole in a mountain,” he said.
Details of the inspection are expected to be included in the next IAEA report on Iran’s nuclear activity due in mid-November.
Gareth Porter has recently written that US threats and regional military posturing prompted Iran to initiate construction of a fortified nuclear facility at Qom. Porter's article contains a timeline with evidence (some taken from unpublicized details of the 2007 NIE), telling a different story from the West's contention that construction of a second enrichment facility began before Tehran's decision to withdraw from a previous agreement to inform the IAEA in advance of such construction. Read the entire article here.
No comments:
Post a Comment