Showing posts with label human rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label human rights. Show all posts

Friday, November 20, 2015

UNSC unanimously adopts French-proposed resolution against ISIL

File photo: United Nations Security Council in session  [photo: UN.org]

According to the UN News Centre, dated 20NOV15:
The United Nations Security Council this evening called on all countries that can do so to take the war on terrorism to Islamic State-controlled territory in Syria and Iraq and destroy its safe haven, warning that the group intends to mount further terror attacks like those that devastated Paris and Beirut last week.
In a unanimously adopted resolution, the 15-member body declared the group’s terrorist attacks abroad “a global and unprecedented threat to international peace and security” following the “horrifying terrorist attacks” it perpetrated recently in Sousse (Tunisia), Ankara (Turkey), over Sinai (Egypt) with the downing of a Russian plane, and in Beirut and Paris.
It warned that the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), or Da’esh as it is also known, “has the capability and intention to carry out” further strikes and called upon “Member States that have the capacity to do so to take all necessary measures, in compliance with international law, in particular international human rights, refugee and humanitarian law” on its territory.
Condemning “in the strongest terms” ISIL and other terrorist groups in the region such Al-Nusrah Front, the Council Member States “to eradicate the safe haven they have established over significant parts of Iraq and Syria.”
It called on Member States to intensify efforts to stem the flow of foreign terrorist fighters to Iraq and Syria and to prevent and suppress the financing of terrorism, and reaffirmed that those responsible for terrorist acts, violations of international humanitarian law or violations or abuses of human rights must be held accountable.
COMMENTARY: The full text of the resolution hadn't been uploaded by the UN at the time of this posting but it appears the the government of the Syrian Arab Republic was not condemned in the resolution, which is significant. According to Russia Today, dated 20NOV15:
Syria’s UN Ambassador, Bashar Ja’afari, hinted prior to Friday’s vote that this resolution was long overdue. “Welcome to everybody who finally woke up and joined the club of combating terrorists.”
Meanwhile, Russia is continuing its work on a draft resolution proposing international military campaigns to fight against Islamic State. The current text is an updated version of a document submitted on September 30.
Previously on 19NOV15 the UNGA human rights committee Thursday adopted a Saudi-proposed resolution condemning certain foreign interventions in Syria

According to Reuters, dated 19NOV15:
The U.N. General Assembly’s human rights committee Thursday adopted a Saudi-drafted resolution condemning Iranian and Russian intervention in Syria, a decision that the Syrian and Iranian delegations rejected as unhelpful and unjustified. The nonbinding resolution, authored by Saudi Arabia and sponsored by Qatar and other Arab nations, the United States and other Western powers, passed by the 193-nation assembly’s third committee.
There were 115 votes in favor, 15 against and 51 abstentions.
Without explicitly naming Russia, it said the General Assembly “strongly condemns all attacks against the Syrian moderate opposition and calls for their immediate cessation, given that such attacks benefit so-called ISIS and other terrorist groups, such as Al-Nusra Front.”
The resolution’s language is clearly aimed at Russia, which has been bombing opposition forces in Syria for two months. Moscow says it is attacking ISIS but Western officials say they have targeted other rebel forces and Western-backed groups.
The resolution also condemned the presence in Syria of “all foreign terrorist fighters ... and foreign forces fighting on behalf of the Syrian regime, particularly the Al-Quds Brigades, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps [of Iran] and other groups such as Hezbollah.”
[…]
The resolution demands foreign militias leave Syria immediately.
It also blasts ISIS and other Islamist militant groups for rights abuses and atrocities.
But most of the criticism in the resolution is aimed at the government of Syrian President Bashar Assad, whom Western and many Arab nations would like to see ousted.
COMMENTARY: Predictably, the Syrians and Iranians rejected the resolution. The Iranian response was put forward by Iran’s Ambassador and Deputy Permanent Representative to the United Nations Gholam Hossein Dehqani. According to PressTV, dated 20NOV15:
Dehqani warned of the “adverse consequences” of the resolution on the UN reputation and said Iranian military forces are present in Syria upon an official request by the Syrian government to provide consultations to the war-hit country.
“Therefore, the adoption of such a text is a violation of international regulations and a breach of governments’ right to establish peace in their own territory,” the Iranian envoy pointed out.
He said such claims are aimed at taking revenge against forces that have so far played the most effective role in the battle against terrorism and extremism, adding that Daesh terrorists would have overran more areas in the Middle East in the absence of such forces.
The Iranian diplomat once again reiterated that the resolution would act as an award for extremists and terrorists as well as all those who use financial and logistical resources to spread extremist and terrorist ideologies.
The Syrian response was put forward by Syria's U.N. Ambassador Bashar Ja'afari. According to Reuters, dated 19NOV15:
Syria's U.N. Ambassador Bashar Ja'afari rejected the resolution and accused its Saudi authors of hypocrisy about what he said are widespread human rights in the kingdom. He referred to "decapitation and flogging in public squares," saying they were like abuses of Islamic State.
He accused the Saudis, along with Qatar and Turkey, of supporting what he said were terrorists in Syria.
The delegates of Qatar, Turkey and Saudi Arabia rejected the charges.

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Ashton Defends Meeting Iran Human Rights Activists

European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton today defended her talks with human rights activists during a recent visit to Iran, saying meeting dissidents is a central part of her official travels. Ashton’s spokesman, Michael Mann, also told reporters that meeting civil society representatives is part of Ashton’s visits.

"She (Ashton) always sees civil society representatives, particularly women, when she travels to a country," Mann said in Vienna. “It was the same when she went to Iran.” (Reuters, 18 March)
On Monday, Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif canceled a customary dinner with Ashton on the eve of the Vienna talks. Iran’s official news agency said Zarif’s decision was due to “undiplomatic” behavior, a reference to her Tehran meeting with female human rights activists, including the human rights lawyer Nasrin Sotoudeh.

File photo: EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton in Brussels, 17 March 2014. (Francois Lenoir/Reuters)

Monday, March 17, 2014

Zarif Cancels Ashton Dinner

Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif has cancelled a dinner meeting planned for tonight with EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton in Vienna over meetings she had with human rights and opposition activists during her visit to Iran earlier this month. (Fars News Agency/AFP.)
The cancelation of the scheduled dinner in Vienna, as reported by Fars, was intended to protest Ashton's “uncoordinated meetings in Tehran,” a reference to her meeting with female human rights activists; including Nasrin Sotoudeh, a human rights lawyer who has represented members of the Iranian opposition, and for which she has been imprisoned herself.

Zarif who has said he was ready to talk to members of opposition in Syria, and regularly meet with opposition parties in Western Europe, cannot accept that any foreign politician could meet with the Iran’s opposition. The Iranian government apparently believes either there is no opposition inside the country, or wished that the problem went away. But it doesn’t work that way! 


File photo: EU foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashton (L) and Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif at a joint press conference. (AFP)

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

EU Delegation Returns From Iran

A delegation from the European Parliament has returned from a one-week visit to Iran, the first since 2007. The visit comes amid a thaw in relations between Iran and the West.

While in Iran, the delegation met with 2012 Sakharov Prize winners Nasrin Sotoudeh and Jafar Panahi and said it discussed human rights issues with the parliament and opposition. (RFE/RL, 18 December)


The delegation, which returned today, said it hoped the EU's special representative on human rights could soon travel to Tehran to start a human rights dialogue.

File photo:
European Parliament building in Strasbourg (lonelyplanet.com)

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Lahiji Elected President of Human Rights Body


Dr. Abdol Karim Lahiji, an Iranian lawyer and a noted human rights activist, was elected Tuesday as president of the International Federation of Human Rights (FIDH). The Paris-based FIDH is a non-governmental federation for human rights organizations. Founded in 1922, FIDH is the oldest international human rights association and today brings together 164 member organizations in over 100 countries.

Lahiji studied law at Tehran University and has been a human rights advocate for over three decades. He lives in Paris, where he founded the Iranian Association for the Defense of Human Rights. He has served as the vice president of FIDH.

After his election as FIDH president, Lahiji called for immediate and unconditional release from prisons of all human rights activists across the world.

File photo: Dr. Abdol Karim Lahiji (RFE/RL)

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Iranian MP Condemns Turkish Crackdown On Journalists

A case of the pot calling the kettle black
Jailed journalist Akbar Gangi
By: Jabbar Fazeli, MD

Mohammad Ali Esfanani, the spokesman for Iran Majlis (parliament) Judicial and Legal Committee, criticized Turkey for its crackdown on journalists.

According to the Turkish newspaper Hurriyet (freedom), Mr. Esfanani told Khabaronline in an interview that "Although some journalists in Turkey have leveled criticism against the ruling system of the country, they cannot be suppressed on [the unsubstantiated] charges of being terrorists" (1).

"There are 450 cases of freedom of speech violations in Turkey at the European Court of Human Rights which indicates the lack of freedom of expression in that country" (1).

"Supporting journalists and freedom of speech is supporting democracy, and the Ankara government should take steps in the direction of respecting the rights of journalists and reporters"(1,2).

This comes on the heel of the media watchdog Reporters Sans Frontieres (RSF) report, which placed Iran as the 6th worst in the treatment of journalists (174th out of 179 countries in the RSF press freedom index for 2013), and fifth worst jailer of journalists (3,4).

Based on the RSF report used by Mr, Esfahani, the only countries worse than Iran in the treatment of journalists are: Somalia, Syria, Turkmenistan, North Korea, and Eritrea.

The first paragraph of the RSF report on Iran reads: "Iran is now on the threshold of joining the 'infernal trio' (Eritrea, North Korea, Turkmenistan), the world’s most repressive countries in the domain of freedom of the press. With almost 30 journalists and bloggers in custody, Iran has become the Middle East’s biggest and among the five biggest prisons in the world for journalists" (4).
Iran also enjoys the designation of 4th most censored country, according to the 2012 data compiled by the CPJ, the Committee to Protect Journalists (5).

Mr. Esfanani should have taken the time to read the full RSF report before deciding to ignore Iran's own appalling record and skipping to attacking Turkey for its poor treatment of journalists.


References:


Photo credit: foriegnpolicyissues.blogspot, Iranian.com

Friday, January 25, 2013

Rights Groups Call on Iran to Stop Execution of Arab-Iranian Activists


Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch urged the Iranian judiciary to quash death sentences against five Arab-Iranians and halt their executions on grounds of torture and unfair legal proceedings.
The five had been sentenced last year on terrorism-related charges because of their links to a banned cultural institute that promoted their Arab heritage. Their death sentences were upheld last week and they were transferred from Karoun prison in Ahvaz, capital of the southwestern province of Khuzestan. Their families no longer know where they are being held, the statement by the rights group said. (Reuters, 24 Janyary)
On Wednesday, 30 human rights organizations and campaigners, including Iran's Nobel Peace Prize winner Shirin Ebadi, also urged Iran to stop the implementation of the death sentences against the five men.
UN Human Right Commission has also voiced concern over the fate of the five detainees.
There are concerns about ... five individuals, Mr Mohammad Ali Amouri, Mr Sayed Jaber Alboshoka, Mr Sayed Mokhtar Alboshoka, Mr Hashem Shabain Amouri and Mr Hadi Rashidi, whose death sentences were apparently recently upheld by the Supreme Court and appear to be at risk of imminent execution. There are serious concerns about the fairness of their trials and allegations that they were subjected to torture.” (UNHRC, 22 January)
Four members of Iran's Arab minority were executed last year. United Nations human rights experts said they were sentenced to death after an opaque trial whose fairness was questionable.

There are no official figures for the size of the Arab minority population in Iran, but Arab-Iranians form the majority in oil-rich Khuzestan province. Many Arab-Iranians fought against Saddam when Iraq invaded Iran in 1980.
Photo: Logo of Amnesty International (AI)

Saturday, October 27, 2012

Iran Cancels Visit by European Parliament Delegation

Parliamentarians Wanted a Visit with Sotoudeh and Panahi

Iran has canceled the visit by a European Parliament delegation to Tehran after the group asked to meet two Iranian activists awarded EU’s prestigious Sakharov prize. The prize for human rights and freedom of thought were given to human rights lawyer Nasrin Sotoudeh, who represents opposition activists and is now in prison for her legal work, and banned filmmaker Jafar Panahi.

The decision came after senior officials at the European Parliament, which on Friday awarded its Sakharov prize to Sotoudeh and Panahi, said they wanted the delegation to meet the two dissidents. (Reuters, 27 October)

“After hearing the new conditions, the Iranians decided to cancel,” European Parliament spokeswoman Satu Helin told Reuters. The delegation was set to travel to Tehran from 27 October to 2 November.

Iran's Mehr news agency quoted an Iranian parliamentary official as saying the European delegation had stated as a “precondition” a visit with Sotoudeh and Panahi.

The meetings between European and Iranian parliamentary delegations were meant to keep open another line of communication, including with civil society.