Back to Tehran for
Consultation
The Iranian team in charge
of technical negotiations with P5+1 on ways to implement the Geneva
Agreement tonight left Vienna for Tehran for consultation. Iran's semi-official
Fars News Agency, which first reported the team’s departure, said no official
explanations for the move have been offered yet. (Fars News Agency, 12 December)
The Iranian and P5+1 teams comprising of technical experts have been negotiating in Vienna since Monday. The meeting was part of the Geneva interim agreement on Iranian nuclear program. The two sides were to agree on how to implement the details of the agreement.
The Iranian and P5+1 teams comprising of technical experts have been negotiating in Vienna since Monday. The meeting was part of the Geneva interim agreement on Iranian nuclear program. The two sides were to agree on how to implement the details of the agreement.
Lol. Dumb dumb dishonest (to themselves) will once again hurt themselves to "prove" a lie.
ReplyDeleteIts a power move of course. Everything will be fine. Trust me.
ReplyDeleteTeraaast me. No one trusts Iranians
DeleteNot many trust racist, zionists.
DeleteLooks like different interpretations of the Geneva "deal" have been emerging........
ReplyDeleteA-F.
It's a cynical attempt to claim that the terms of the actual agreement, which left sanctions in place and in force, somehow are not the terms of the actual agreement.
ReplyDeleteit's haggling bullshit and basic conniving dishonesty.
Anon 5:48 PM
DeleteI don't understand your statements, they are incompatieble.
Right after the "deal" was reached, Iranian spokeswomam Marzijeh Afkham, published Iranian version (translation) of the deal, and denied some meaninigs of the deal, presented by the American officials........
A-F
It's called iranian bazi
DeleteIt's called zionist propaganda, otherwise known as hasbara.
Delete" I don't understand your statements, they are incompatieble.
ReplyDeleteA-F
Iranian or American statements about the deal........ are not germane.
the deal itself is either a written document approved by all parties or it is not.............there are no terms of the deal that are not spelled out in the documents.......
if you have information about extra-documentary understandings that prohibit things not prohibited in the document.... please furnish them.
however, I'm not interested in some "interpretation" that is not supported by agreement.